2020. 3. 3. 20:48ㆍ카테고리 없음
The top feature request that has not yet been addressed is, which seems to imply that a lot of you would like to go back to the way these were displayed in the original Soulseek client. One arrangement I'm considering is a table where repeating information in a given column is only shown the first time, so for example a series of transfers from the same user will only show the username on the first row, and the folder name on the first row of each set of files from the same folder. The tradeoff is that it won't be possible to show the overall progress for each folder and user, as those all appear on the same row. to post comments.
I'd rather have one single view than two separate ones, the non-default of which most users don't even know about. Two views are difficult to maintain, as I've discovered since implementing old-style search results. The logic for actually arranging all the information in a tree where every column can be a category index is quite complicated, but what I'm describing above is very similar - it would be a table where identical information in the same column won't repeat, so it would have a tree-like appearance. You'd be able to move the columns around and change the sorting so you should be able to do anything you want. to post comments. I MUCH prefer the original Soulseek which I began using in 2002. The search results in particular, but the overall layout was preferable for me.
I didn't understand what the QT upgrade was for. I think if we could have a hybrid of both versions, combining the best features that would be great.I like to be able to sort my search results by the different columns depending on what information is important to me. It would be awesome if we could also filter search results for specific terms or filter out terms by adding a minus sign in front.I also used to be a regular in the chat rooms, and would hang out with friends daily there for years, until the new build.
Now the rooms I used to go to each morning are dead and no one really speaks much any more. I can't help but feel that the new design changed things and kinda killed off some of the communities. But perhaps other groups haven't had any problem?Big thanks anyway for all the years of a great program.
It's still the number one place to find all sorts of rare and random music from all around the world. =). to post comments. I'm not sure if setting it as the default is the answer. It's clear from this poll that people's preference toward one style or the other is split pretty evenly. However I do think that seeing as so many users do prefer the old style, it should be made much more apparent that the option exists for old style search results, as I suspect most are not aware of it.
Perhaps a dialog when the user first runs the client that gives them the choice?Also, do users who prefer old style search results feel as empathically about old style transfers? That's certainly something I can do. to post comments. Ok, so I've had a very industrious weekend and got the client to the point where you can now configure the transfers view to display as a list instead of a tree, a-la the original Soulseek client.
This is in addition to being able to do the same for search results, which has been a SoulseekQt option for a long time now. You should now also be able to move the columns around in both transfers and search results, and the new column positions will be saved between sessions. Lots changed under the hood so problems are likely with both tree and list display styles. Let me know how it works for you!Windows:OSX:. to post comments.
Games Folder Icons
.Chocolatey for Business (C4B) is the enterprise offering that enables companies to adopt a DevOps approach to managing their Windows environment, allowing you to deliver applications to your users more reliably and faster.Pro is a personal, named license that grants having licensed versions of Chocolatey on up to 8 machines and provides the ultimate Chocolatey experience!.Chocolatey has the largest online registry of Windows packages. Learn how Open Source Chocolatey can support your next project. Welcome to the Chocolatey Community Package Repository! The packages found in this section of the site are provided, maintained, and moderated by the community. ModerationEvery version of each package undergoes a rigorous moderation process before it goes live that typically includes:., consistency, and. Human moderators who give final review and sign offMore detail at.
Organizational UseIf you are an organization using Chocolatey, we want your experience to be fully reliable.Due to the nature of this publicly offered repository, cannot be guaranteed.Packages offered here are subject to distribution rights, which means they may need to reach out further to the internet to the official locations to download files at runtime.Fortunately, distribution rights do not apply for internal use. With any edition of Chocolatey (including the free open source edition), you can and cache or existing community packages.DisclaimerYour use of the packages on this site means you understand they are not supported or guaranteed in any way. Ground Rules:. This discussion is only about Soulseek and the Soulseek package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the. This discussion will carry over multiple versions.
If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that youwill get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the linkon the left side of this page or follow this link to.If you still hear nothing back, please follow the.
Tell us what you love about the package or Soulseek, or tell us what needs improvement. Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found. If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner.
It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.